COMPLAINT against VACCINATION (ENGLISH) (any country) (INTERNATIONAL)
CRIMINAL COURT / INSTRUCTION / COURT
GENERAL REGISTRATION / DISTRIBUTION
TO THE CRIMINAL COURT / INSTRUCTION / TO THE COURT
Mr. ………… ..
……………………………. ……………., of legal age, with ID number ………… ..., with address on the
street ……… ……………. ……………., of ………… .., telephone ………., before the Criminal Court
/ Instruction / Criminal Court appears and with due respect and consideration
EXPOSES :
That by
means of this brief it files a COMPLAINT for the following
alleged continuing crimes:
Against
public health and other correlatives and related .
Crime of
injuries.
Crime against humanity .
Cover-up
crime .
Crime of discovery and disclosure of secrets (discovery of
secrets or violation of the privacy of another, without their consent, use of
technical devices for listening, transmission, recording of messages, or any
other communication signal).
They are people
criminally responsible for the crimes: the perpetrators and accomplices .
Authors are those who carry out the act on their own, jointly or through another
that they use as an instrument.
They will also
be considered authors:
a) Those that directly induce another or others to
execute it.
b) Those who cooperate in its execution with an act
without which it would not have been carried out.
Those who, not
being included in the previous article, cooperate in the execution of the act
with previous or simultaneous acts are accomplices .
Against the alleged authors cited in
this writing and others unknown to them.
1.- That the
undersigned has had news that THERE ARE INDICATIONS OF THE COMMISSION OF CRIMES
AGAINST PUBLIC HEALTH, and other related and related crimes, crime
of injuries, crime of genocide, crime against humanity, crime
of concealment, crime of discovery and
revelation of secrets based on the
following
FACTS :
FIRST .-
With the date of September 8 as a reference, in Spain a total of 67,385,522 doses of any of the four available
vaccines have been administered , and the complete schedule has been inoculated
to 34,418,544 people with approved Pfizer vaccines.
BioNTech- authorized on December 21, 2020 -, Moderna -authorized on January 6, 2021-, AstraZeneca
, authorized on January 29, 2021 and the single dose of Janssen
authorized on March 11, 2021 .
Similarly, many doses have been
administered vaccine in our country .
SECOND .-
On 2-11-2021, Dr.
D. Pablo Campra Madrid , Professor at the University of Almería
(Spain), and Doctor in Chemical Sciences and Bachelor of Biological Sciences ,
University of Almería, Carr. Sacramento, ./n, 04120 La Cañada, Almería (Spain), has issued a FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT ON GRAPHENE DETECTION IN
COVID VACCINES where the presence of Graphene Oxide in the samples from Pfzer,
Astrazeneca, Moderna and Janssen is concluded.
It is published at the following internet link:
It is accompanied with this document on CD, with DOCUMENT Nº 1 .
Deciding
, on page 15 , the following:
" CONCLUSIONS :
A random
sampling of COVID19 vaccine vials has been carried out using the
coupled micro-RAMAN technique to characterize microscopic objects with a
graphene appearance using spectroscopic signals characteristic of the molecular
structure. The micro -RAMAN technique allows to reinforce the level of confidence
in the identification of the material through the coupling of images and
spectral analysis as observational evidences that must be considered together. Objects
have been detected whose RAMAN signals by similarity to the pattern unequivocally
correspond to REDUCED GRAPHENE OXIDE . "
On page
19 , it indicates the vaccines that were the object of such analysis
carried out:
ANNEX 1 : COVID19 VACCINES mRNA under micro-RAMAN analysis :
PFIZER 1
(RD1). Lot EY3014. Sealed
PFIZER 2
(WBR). Lot No. FD8271.
Sealed
PFIZER 3
(ROS). Lot No. F69428. Sealed
PFIZER 4
(ARM). Lot No. FE4721. Sealed A
STRAZENECA
(AZ MIT). Lot No.
ABW0411. Sealed
MODERN
(MOD). Lot No. 3002183. Not sealed
JANSSEN
(JAN). Lot No. Not available. Not sealed.
THIRD .-
1.- There
are numerous studies and scientific reports that prove the
EXTREME TOXICITY IN THE HUMAN BODY of the chemical
component REDUCED GRAPHENE OXIDE , which causes a wide and
innumerable diseases that affect all types of vital organs:
This can be seen in the REPORTS AND SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS ON THE TOXICITY OF GRAPHENE OXIDE IN
LIVING BEINGS AND IN THE HUMAN BEING IN PARTICULAR, which summarizes more than 60 scientific publications
where they evaluate the Toxicity of Graphene Oxide in human biology .
Which are published in the following internet link:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/xcfp8arvikjgi21/2-%20GRAPHENE%20OXIDE%20TOXICITY%20REPORT.pdf?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/do0yilsjrbgwcvc/2-INFORMES_TOXICIDAD_%C3%93XIDO_DE_GRAFENO.pdf?dl=0
It is accompanied with this document on CD, with DOCUMENT Nº 2 .
2.- Also, with the title Toxicity of graphene-family nanoparticles: a
general review of the origins and mechanisms, has been issued a SCIENTIFIC REPORT WITH A LIST OF 240 OFFICIAL
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES ON THE TOXICITY OF GRAPHENE Toxicity of nanoparticles of
the family of graphene: an overview of the origins and mechanisms . Ou, L.,
Song, B., Liang, H. et al. Part Fiber Toxicol 13, 57. Published: October 2016
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/s12989-016-0168-y Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University,
Guangzhou, 510515, China Bin Song, Huimin Liang, Jia Liu , Xiaoli Feng and
Longquan Shao
Full report : https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12989-016-0168-y#article-info
https://particleandfibretoxicology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12989-016-0168-y
It is accompanied with this document on CD, with DOCUMENT No. 3 .
3.- Based on
these studies and scientific / clinical reports, it is deduced the cause
of the following diseases as a result of the use and perfusive inoculation in
humans of the product REDUCED GRAPHENE OXIDE , which is found as
a major component in the indicated vaccines.
This is
concealed and not declared by the pharmaceutical manufacturing laboratories
, in their information leaflets to the public, as well as in their
complementary information websites, and, neither, declared by the regulatory
and approving or authorizing health authorities (whether the AEM,
the Spanish Medicines Agency, such as the EMA, the European Medicines Agency,
or the CDC, or the National Medicines Agency), which should have supervised and
controlled its production and use.
Disease that causes the graphene oxide form REDUCED DIRECT AND
MAIN :
Graphene oxide generates thrombi .
Graphene oxide causes blood clotting .
Graphene toxicity in human sperm
Graphene dangers and its secondary effects on human biology .
It causes pulmonary fibrosis, a cause of lung cancer .
Graphene toxicity in normal human lung cells .
Induce reproductive toxicity in male mammals .
Affects the testes, epididymis, and fertility of Wistar rats
Touch the blood: in vivo interactions of 2D materials with "Biological
Crown" effect
Induce mutagenesis (cancer) in vitro and in vivo
Mediates Inhibition of Autophagy and Inflammation in a Three-Dimensional
Model of the Human Airway
Causes differential toxicity in human lung cells mediated by oxidative
stress
Provokes cytotoxic effects on human
lung epithelial cells
They induce apoptosis in MCF-7 cells through mitochondrial damage and the
NF-KB pathway
Toxicity to human cells and zebrafish
In vitro cytotoxicity in alveolar cells
Damage lysosomal and mitochondrial membranes and induce apoptosis of
RBL-2H3 cells
Genotoxicity in human mesenchymal stem cells
Differential genotoxic and epigenotoxic effects on human bronchial
epithelial cells
Induce DNA damage and alter microtubule structure in epithelial cells of
the human esophagus
Exposure of blood to graphene oxide causes anaphylactic death in primates
Damages human primary endothelial cells
Induce toxicity in blood-brain barrier cells (Studied in Vitro and In Vivo
Study
DNA damage related to oxygen content in human retinal pigment epithelial
cells
Cytotoxicity in PC12 cells derived from neural pheochromocytoma
Cell toxicity in human embryonic kidney cells
Damages the ability of mammals to reproduce
Damages the intestine and testicles
Cytoxicity and genotoxicity in sperm
Adverse effects on the reproductive system
Differential effect on the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines
Extended acute toxicity and pharmacology administered intravenously
It causes a viral host response in the immune system as if it were a
pathogen
Induce apoptotic cell death in endothelial cells by activating autophagy
Damages DNA in human primary endothelial cells
Verifies multiple toxicity effects in interaction with mammalian cells
Synthesis and toxicity in: Environmental mutagenicity and carcinogenicity
Radio frequency characteristic of graphene oxide capable of damaging human
DNA
Sufficiently
clear and representative of the facts that confirm the commission of the crimes
indicated above.
FOURTH.- These facts have already been sufficiently proven, accredited and
scientifically studied, there being multiple tests and scientific studies that
conclude on the seriousness for the collective public health of this TOXIC /
POISONOUS component detected in the composition of the vaccines applied in this
campaign vaccination in Spain and others Countries.
FIFTH .-
AN ENGLISH
NEWSPAPER PUBLISHES THE "SCANDAL OFFICIAL FIGURES" OF "INJURED
AND DEAD" BY VACCINES :
THE ENGLISH
NEWSPAPER "THE CHELTENHAM POST" , PUBLISHES THE NUMBER OF
DEAD AND INJURED, DISCRIMINATED BY DIAGNOSIS, REGION AND VACCINE BRAND that
qualifies as GENOCIDAL
IT REPORTS
THAT ONLY IN GREAT BRITAIN, THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE UNITED STATES HAVE
THE FRIENDLY FIGURE OF:
6. 636,471
HUMAN BEINGS INJURED AND
40,679
KILLED BY THE alleged TRANSGENIC POISON .
ALSO WARN:
THAT
"TRANSGENIC VACCINES" HAVE NEVER BEEN USED IN HUMANS BEFORE .
THAT THEY
ARE "NOT" APPROVED IMMUNIZATIONS , BUT HAVE BEEN
"AUTHORIZED FOR EMERGENCY USE" .
WHICH ARE "EXPERIMENTAL"
VACCINES , WHOSE PHASE 3 COMES ONLY IN 2023 .
THAT THE
LABORATORIES "WILL NOT" BE LIABLE FOR THE DAMAGES .
THAT ONLY
BETWEEN 1% AND 10% OF THE TOTAL ADVERSE EFFECTS THAT OCCUR ARE REPORTED.
It can be found at the link: https://t.me/SaludyJusticiaCordoba/684
It is accompanied with this document on CD, with DOCUMENT Nº 4 .
SIXTH .-
1.-
Likewise, a DEVICE for control, identification, obtaining personal data,
monitoring and tracking, electronically known as a chip, has
been INSERTED into the body of those vaccinated with the
injection of each vaccine, which emits a personal data signal
from the Bluetooth frequency band and identifies each
vaccinated with a specific and personal MAC number .
The address MAC (Media Access
Control) is a unique identifier for a network device, sometimes also
known as the address physical , and is unique for each
device .
This has been discovered and investigated ,
among many others, by Dr. Luis Benito de Benito, who carried out an experimental investigation that carried out the summer
months of 2021 with inoculates detecting that they emitted
MAC addresses by bluetooth. This MAC address is unique for each
inoculate, and can be variable for it.
Said STUDY OF MAC
ADDRESSES IN BLUETOOTH BY Dr.
Luís Miguel Benito de Benito, Digestologist , Av. De la Peseta, C. Cuevas de Altamira, 40, Entry by, 28054
Madrid (Spain), can be found at the
link: https :
//odysee.com/@drBenito: 7 / directo26-10a: f? r =
8qjPwG8VB8Z9EGGQPLU4DVo5hYpAPjde
And in the links:
https://odysee.com/@drBenito:7/directo02-11a:3
https://t.me/OPERAC_ENJAMBRE/1677643
tg: // resolve? domain = OPERAC_ENJAMBRE &
post = 1677643
https://t.me/s/laquintacolumna/12890
https://web.telegram.org/k/#?tgaddr=tg%3A%2F%2Fresolve%3Fdomain%3DOPERAC_ENJAMBRE%26post%3D1677643
It is accompanied with this document on CD, with DOCUMENT No. 5 .
Claiming to be coordinated in his research with
various international research teams.
2. This
implies also a violation of personal privacy which data are protected by the
Organic Law 3/2018, of 5 December on Personal
Data Protection and guarantee of digital rights :
Infringing its article 1, which protects a) natural persons
with regard to the processing of their personal data and the free circulation
of these data , b) whose protection must be exercised in
accordance with the provisions of Regulation (EU) 2016 / 679 and this
organic law, and c) guarantees the digital rights of citizens in
accordance with the mandate established in article 18.4 of the Constitution
.
And the duty of confidentiality established
in its article 5 .
The author of this vaccination having
committed the crime of discovery and
disclosure of secrets (discovering secrets or violating the privacy of another , without their consent, seizing their papers, letters,
emails or any other documents or personal effects, intercepting
telecommunications or using technical devices for listening, transmission,
recording or reproduction of sound or image, or any other communication
signal).
SEVENTH..- :
/web.telam.org/k/#?tgaddr=tg%3A%2F%2Fresolve%3Fdomain%3DOPERAC_ENJAMB
1. has
been detected massively worldwide with a magnetic effect of attraction of
the human body vaccinated from metal objects that could
be attracted by a magnet or also a magnet, such as spoons, forks,
needles, even mobile phones, or magnets .
This effect is reported and
presented in numerous videos, televisions, private reports and documents, and
scientific research.
1.1.- Thus, the Spanish
television presenter Ms. Susana Griso , after being vaccinated, verified
live on Antena3 that magnets or metal objects were sticking to
her arm, although she later denied it.
1.2.1.- This effect has also been well accredited by Mr. Ricardo
Delgado Martín, Biostatist, domiciled in Carmona
(Seville-Spain), with email ricardodelgado@laquintacolumna.net .
in your
existing video / report recorded in the link of your channel: https://odysee.com/@laquintacolumna:8/ELMAGNETISMODELOSVACUNADOSDALAVUELTAALMUNDO-VIDEO36-:f
It is accompanied with
this writing on CD, with DOCUMENT Nº 6 .
Likewise, it can be seen in the following links of the
Odysee channel of La Quinta Columna de D. Ricardo Delgado Martín :
https://odysee.com/@laquintacolumna:8/MAGNETIZADOSTRASLAVACUNAPORTODOELMUNDO-VIDEO33-:2
https://odysee.com/@catarsisman:6/MAGNETISMO-EXARCEBADO-TRAS-LA-VACUNA---VIDEO-46--:0
https://odysee.com/@laquintacolumna:8/MILLONESDEMAGNETIZADOSTRASLAVACUNA-VIDEO31-:e
The new
"magnetic" phenomenon acquired after the administration of the
covid19 "vaccines" in its different variants is the object of study
in the LA QUINTA COLUMNA web group directed by Mr.
Ricardo Delgado Martín , domiciled in Carmona
(Seville), with email ricardodelgado@laquintacolumna.net .
Affirming that the human being is NOT magnetic in
its natural form and we must adequately understand the mechanisms by which the
population becomes "magnetic" after this vaccination inoculation,
other and other routes of administration such as PCR, prolonged use of masks, etc..
We are aware of the consequences of acquiring magnetism in the current
electromagnetic soup in which we already live and that will soon turn on
simultaneously and globally.
1.2.2.- In
your Telegram channel "MAGNÉTIC PINCHAZO" there are multiple
testimonies and audiovisuals collected in different parts of the world of this
anomaly of acquisition of magnetism caused after vaccination .
Other links are: https://t.me/joinchat/UGgaJgBHOVxhZTlk , https://t.me/joinchat/46gh6cjIlBxhZGE8 and https://web.telegram.org/z/#-1498532043 .
1.3.- In the
link https://asia.nikkei.com/Spotlight/Coronavirus/COVID-vaccines/1.6m-Moderna-doses-withdrawn-in-Japan-over-contamination , of 26-8-21, it is collected the statement (from the previous Thursday)
of the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan , noting
that around 1.6 million doses of Moderna's coronavirus vaccine have been
withdrawn in Japan due to contamination reported in some vials. Several
vaccination centers have reported that the vaccine vials contained foreign
matter, according to an announcement by the ministry, which withdrew them in
the country's inoculation program. The ministry later said that the substance
that had been mixed could be metallic. " It is a substance that
reacts to magnets ."
EIGHTH .-
1.- In this situation, the Spanish Ministry of
Health admits that it DOES NOT HAVE any reliable scientific proof
of the existence of the isolation, cultivation, purification or sequencing of
the fraudulent SARS-CoV-2 virus .
The reply in official letter dated 14-9-21 from
the General Director of Public Health of the Secretary of State
for Health of the Spanish Ministry of Health, was as follows:
"The Ministry of Health does not have the
culture of SARS-CoV-2 for testing , and does
not have one record laboratories capable of culture and isolation
for testing ".
Whose link is at https://web.telegram.org/z/#-1334315064 , https://t.me/OPERAC_ENJAMBRE/1671512 and https://drive.google.com/file/d/1kfAEzVxjv2PFJ9EWqd4h8vFXHTBiZiOP/view
It is accompanied with
this document on CD, with DOCUMENT Nº 7 .
Without such a reliable existence of
such a virus , recognized, also, by many other foreign organizations,
such as the American CDC of the USA , or the Irish Ministry
of Health , or the Portuguese , the manufacture of
a vaccine against it becomes rational and fundamentally IMPOSSIBLE ,
for as the fundamental principle of action of the vaccination technique is to inoculate an attenuated sample (or sequenced reproduction thereof)
of such virus to create immunity antibodies.
2. Subpoenaed by the Court, the Ministry of Health
PORTUGAL AND HEALTH DEPARTMENT OF PORTUGAL ADMITTED that HAVE NO
SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE PANDEMIC OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MEASURES FOR THE SAFETY OF
VACCINES, and admit that in THE ENTIRE NATIONAL TERRITORY (PORTUGAL) HAVE DEAD
JUST 152 PEOPLE FROM COVID-19, AND THEY CANNOT EXPLAIN WHAT COVID-19 IS AS THEY
COULD NOT PROVIDE SCIENTIFICALLY THE EXISTENCE OF THE ALLEGED SARSCOV2 .
What is established in the Sentence of the Administrative
Court of Círculo de Lisboa, of 5-19-21, in process 525/21.
It can be
found at the link: https://t.me/OPERAC_ENJAMBRE/818404
It is accompanied with this writing on CD, DOCUMENT
Nº 8 .
Indicating in said judgment that: Regarding the request for non-procedural
information, it was found that none of the documents, reports, evidence
and information requested in paragraphs a) to q) of article 4.0 of the
requests are in the possession of the DGS.
The required documents being the following:
Opinions and scientific publications available in
their archives on the Covid-19 disease declared by the World Health
Organization as "the Covid-19 epidemic :
I - Copy of
a scientific publication peer (peer-review) , on the study
of the degree of human infection SMRSCov2 Covid-19 virus from a
sample unadulterated taken from a human patient ;
II - Copy of
a peer-reviewed scientific publication on the study of the scope
of human infection with FAS "S-Cov2 obtained empirically and that shows
that the postulates of Koch / Evans (1976) are fulfilled, with the date and the
6 authors who performed the isolation and purification of the virus in the
laboratory ,
III - Copy
of the peer-reviewed scientific publication, regarding the RT-PCR
test (polymerase chain reaction) as a reliable diagnostic tool to identify the
SARS-Cov2 virus in humans, that is, if the RT-PCR test identifies the presence
of the viral RAIA and the presence of said infectious ;
IV - Copy of
the peer-reviewed scientific publication in which the result of the PCR
test specifically indicates, without margin of error, the presence of the
SARS-Cov2 virus in humans with flu-like symptoms ;
V - Copy of
a scientific publication, peer-reviewed, demonstrating that the positive
result of the PCR test indicates, without margin of error, the presence of
SARS-Cov2 infection in humans without symptoms (asymptomatic) and that they
transmit the disease to third parties ;
VI - A copy of the
peer-reviewed scientific publication that identifies the symptoms of the
new disease resulting from the infection with SARSCov2 and what distinguishes
the new and presumed disease from seasonal influenza and from the disease
caused by the already known 229E strains , NL63, OC43 and "KUI coronavirus
strains" ;
VII -
Documented information on the defined amplification cycle for the PCR
tests used in Portugal, and indication of the entity that determined the
defined cycle ;
VIII -
Information on the PCR tests used in Portugal to detect infection
by SÄRS-C0v2, if they are able to distinguish inactive and reproductive
material ;
IX - Information on the types
of virus, and the respective strains, detectable by the CRF test used massively
in obtaining "infected covid-19" among the population in Portugal ;
IX -
Scientific evidence reviewed by experts that supports the
application of quarantine and confinement measures to people who are positive,
by means of the PCR test, and asymptomatic ;
X - Copy of
the document published and reviewed by Chinese scientists in which the
genetic code of the new coronavirus SARS-Cov2 is traced ;
XI -
Information / report on the number of deaths in Portugal, since the
beginning of the declared pandemic, caused by the SARS-Cov2 infection, the
cause of death having been objectively and legally verified by autopsy of the
corpses ;
XII -
Information / report on the number of deaths in Portugal, since the
beginning of the declared pandemic, caused by the SARS-Cov2 infection, the
cause of death having been verified by means of the PCR test ;
XIII -
Scientific proof of the effectiveness of social distancing. with the
respective empirical base reviewed by peers (peer-review), in the context of
the disease covid-19 ;
XIV - The
World Health Organization (WHO) published on April 6, 2020 a reassessment on
the use of personal protective masks, focusing on the specific issue of
SARS-COV2, and concluded: "masks continue to be recommended only for
certain specific groups: patients infected by SARS-Cov2, people with symptoms,
caregivers or healthcare professionals in contact with infected or suspected
patients.
Therefore, and as a result of
the aforementioned WHO publication, we request a copy of the publications
with scientific evidence, held by the DGS, of peer-reviewed studies that demonstrate
without a doubt that there are no collateral damage to physical health and
psychological derived from the use of masks by children, youth and adults in
closed and open spaces ;
XV - Testing
scientific, from publications specialized peer, which demonstrate that
the confinement of people without symptoms of being diseased
significantly reduces the transmission of respiratory disease covid-19, and the
benefit of the confinement for the health of the population ;
XVI - Evidence,
duly documented, that the so-called last generation experimental
vaccines do not represent genetic manipulation and that, as a whole, they do
not constitute a danger of damage, in the medium and long term, to the health
of those who have been and are being vaccinated with vaccines not yet approved
and without evaluated clinical data, although recommended to the population by
the General Directorate of Health .
3.- In the United
States of America , hundreds of Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
requests have revealed that there is not a single record anywhere in the
world of SARS-CoV-2 that the virus has been isolated or purified SARS-CoV-2 .
Link: https://t.me/Espanolesdespiertos/423992 .
4.- The same response has been obtained by the Administrative
Litigation Court nº…. of… , of Spain, in appeal proceedings nº… /
21 , of the reply of the Ministry of Health to the office
delivered to the same interested party to send a report on whether it had
analyzed or was aware of having done so the virus of COVID-19 or SARS COV 2 or
if it had evidence of its existence or of its isolation or detection or search .
5.- Which implies
recognizing that the product is DEFECTIVE and USELESS in its
origin, because it lacks the sample / similarity of the virus against which to
immunize , as a fundamental principle of action of the vaccination technique to be inoculated.
Without such
reliable existence of such a virus , recognized, the manufacture
of a vaccine against it becomes rational and fundamentally IMPOSSIBLE ,
since the fundamental principle of action of the vaccination technique is to inoculate an attenuated sample (or sequenced reproduction thereof)
of such virus to create immunity antibodies.
FIRST .-
The criminal
legislation includes the following crimes:
Against
public health and other correlatives and related .
Crime of
injuries.
Crime against humanity .
Cover-up
crime .
Crime of discovery and disclosure of secrets ( discovery of
secrets or violation of the privacy of another, without their consent, use of
technical devices for listening, transmission, recording of messages, or any
other communication signal).
The concept of the crime of discovery
and disclosure of secrets refers to the dissemination or leakage of
information or material of oneself that is not wanted to transcend the public
sphere. The privacy of a person is violated when someone else enters that
intimate area without authorization or right.
SECOND .- The Constitution
establishes:
Protection of health, being a right of all and duty
of the State, guaranteed by means of social and economic policies with a
view to reducing the risk of disease and of other grievances and
universal access and equal access to actions and services for its promotion,
protection and
recovery.
Recognizing the right to health protection.
It is the responsibility of the public
authorities to organize and protect public health through preventive measures
and the necessary benefits and services.
Public authorities must promote health
education.
THIRD .-
ONE .-
In this
context, what is indicated by the recent judgment of the Court of Justice of
the European Union (CJEU) (Second Chamber) of June 21, 2017, C-621/15 (WXY v.
Sanofi Pasteur MSD SNC, Caisse primaire d'assurance maladie des Hauts-de Seine,
Caisse Carpimko).
The Judgment
resolves a case of damages caused by the administration of a vaccine. Mr. W was
vaccinated against hepatitis B by a vaccine produced by a pharmaceutical
laboratory, which was administered in three injections, the last one on July 8,
1999. In August 1999, Mr. W began to present various ailments , as a result of
which multiple sclerosis was diagnosed in November 2000. His state of health
progressively worsened until he reached a functional disability of 90% that
required permanent assistance from a third person, and this until the day of
his death, which took place on October 30, 2011. In 2006, Mr. W and others,
namely three members of his family, filed, based on articles 1386-1 et seq. of
the Civil Code, a lawsuit in which they requested that the laboratory be
condemned to compensate the damages they had suffered as a result of the
administration of the vaccine. In support of this claim, they argued that the
concomitance between the vaccine and the appearance of multiple sclerosis and
the absence of personal and family history of Mr. W in relation to said
disease, allowed to consider that there were solid, concrete and concordant
presumptions in what it concerns the existence of a defect in the vaccine and
of a causal relationship between the injection of the latter and the appearance
of the aforementioned disease. They were based on the jurisprudence of the Cour
de Cassation , according to which, in the area of liability of
pharmaceutical laboratories for damage caused by the vaccines they produce,
proof of the existence of a defect in the vaccine and of a relationship of
causality between said defect and the damage suffered by the injured party may
result from solid, concrete and concordant presumptions that the judge who
hears the merits of the case can sovereignly appreciate. The CJEU resolves the
preliminary rulings raised by the Cour de Cassation in such a way that,
what it seems to confirm is the necessary assessment of the circumstances by
the judge in each specific case: it does not admit a general regime of
presumptions, nor does it reverse the burden of proof of the causal link, but
allows it to be considered proven when certain circumstances occur. Thus, he
points out:
1) Article 4 of Directive 85/374 / EEC must be interpreted in the sense
that it does not preclude a national evidentiary regime such as that at issue
in the main proceedings, by virtue of which, when exercised before the judge
hearing the Merits of the case an action that aims to declare the
responsibility of the producer of a vaccine for the damage caused by an alleged
defect in the latter, said judge may consider, in exercise of the power of
appreciation that is invested in this In this regard, that, despite the
consideration that medical research has not demonstrated or refuted the
existence of a relationship between the administration of the vaccine in
question and the appearance of the disease suffered by the injured party, some
facts invoked by the plaintiff constitute solid, concrete and concordant
indications that allow to conclude that the vaccine suffers from a defect and
that there is a causal relationship between said defect and the disease.
However, national courts must ensure that the specific application of this
evidentiary regime does not lead them to erroneously apply the burden of proof
established in the aforementioned Article 4, nor to undermine the effectiveness
of the liability regime established by said Directive.
2) Article 4 of Directive
85/374 must be interpreted in the sense that it opposes an evidentiary regime
based on presumptions according to which, when medical research has not
demonstrated or refuted the existence of a relationship between the administration
of a vaccine and the appearance of the disease suffered by the injured party,
the existence of a causal relationship between the defect attributed to a
vaccine and the damage suffered by the injured party is considered in any case
proven if certain predetermined factual indications of causation concur.
Article 137 TRLGDCU, in
accordance with Article 6 of Directive 85/374 / EEC, considers a defective
product to be one that does not offer the security that could legitimately be
expected, taking into account all the circumstances and, especially, its
presentation, reasonable use foreseeable of the same and the moment of its
putting into circulation. The legitimately expected lack of security has to be
determined according to the criterion (objective) of the average consumer, that
is, that is, the consumer who is normally informed and reasonably
attentive and insightful . It is irrelevant whether the lack of
security is due to a manufacturing, design or information defect.
The CJEU, in
the matter of vaccines, has softened the burden of proof of the causal
nexus by stating that the national judge that hears the claim of
responsibility may consider, in exercise of the power of assessment with which
it is invested in this regard, that, despite the consideration that medical
research has neither proven nor refuted the existence of a relationship between
the administration of a vaccine and the appearance of the disease suffered by
the injured party, some facts invoked by the plaintiff constitute solid,
concrete evidence and concordant that allow to conclude that the vaccine
suffers from a defect and that there is a causal relationship between said
defect and the disease .
However, the
CJEU expressly warns that Article 4 of Directive 85/374 / EEC opposes an
evidentiary regime based on presumptions according to which, when medical
research has not demonstrated or refuted the existence of a relationship
between the administration of a vaccine and the appearance of the disease
suffered by the injured party , the existence of a causal
relationship between the defect attributed to a vaccine and the damage suffered
by the injured party is in any case considered proven if certain predetermined
factual indications of causation concur .
The national
judge when assessing the evidence on liability for defective medicines and
health products must attend to the information provided by those to the
injured party , especially the prospectus . In the case
of vaccines, the "adequate" information provided by the physician
about the same and the possible adverse effects, is sufficient, both for the
purposes of informed consent, and for information on side effects. In this
context, adequate pharmacovigilance is of particular relevance in order
to determine the lack of sufficient entity of a claim that seeks to question
the benefit / risk ratio .
TWO .-
Regarding
VACCINES, DEFECTS AND CAUSAL RELATIONSHIP, it is worth highlighting the JUDGMENT
OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION C-621/15, OF JUNE 21 , 2017
, NW AND OTHERS AGAINST SANOFI PASTEUR AND OTHERS:
It indicates that the criteria of the Cour d'Appel de
Paris (Court of Appeal of Paris) concluded that the criteria of temporal
proximity between the vaccine and the first symptoms and the existence
or not of personal and family history invoked by W. et
al., Are decisive to constitute, jointly or separately, solid, concrete
and concordant presumptions that allow to conclude that there was a causal
relationship between the vaccine and the disease in question. (para.
16). Lacking such elements, the criterion, in the opposite sense, is different.
These two
data ( temporal proximity and lack of antecedents )
are solid, concrete and concordant indications that allow us to
demonstrate the existence of a defect in the vaccine and the causal
relationship between the injection of the vaccine and the disease .
To which is
added the MULTIPLICITY OF AFFECTED as a third conclusive element
.
There are sufficient studies in the reported
facts that are provided to support the causal relationship , not
in the case of an isolated publication , but of multiple
of them conclusive in the same sense , which have been well
accredited in the scientific world due to the large number of
cases analyzed s and without the existence of methodological failures, whose
multiple studies seriously substantiate the scientific evidence , as
adduces, a sensu contrary , the judgment of Paris.
The member states have to safeguard, in any
case, the principles of equivalence and effectiveness .
If medical
research has neither proven nor refuted the existence of a causal relationship
between the administration of the vaccine and the development of multiple sclerosis, there is indirect evidence, by indications .
Excluding the indirect method and forcing the injured party to provide
concrete and irrefutable proof of the causal relationship between the defect
and the disease would be contrary to the requirements of the Directive (para.
30), as this would have the effect that would make it excessively
difficult, or even impossible, to demand responsibility from the producer (para.
31). The exclusion of certain tests would be contrary to the objectives
of the Directive , which include that of guaranteeing the fair
distribution of the risks inherent in modern technical production between the
injured party and the producer, and of protecting the safety and health of
consumers (para. 32).
What the CJEU
establishes is that it is not possible to exclude, from the
outset, any type of evidence; therefore, neither is the circumstantial evidence
.
Therefore (when) the evidence
provided is "sufficiently solid, specific and consistent, so
that the conclusion can be accepted that , despite the data provided
and the allegations made in its defense by the producer, the existence of a
Product defect appears to be the most plausible explanation for the occurrence
of damage, so that such defect and causality can be reasonably considered to
have been established ” (para. 37).
THE OBJECT OF THE TEST AND THE BURDEN OF
PROOF:
Directive 85/374 establishes that the injured party must prove
the damage, the defect
and the causal relationship between the two (art. 4). Two conclusions are
drawn from this brief precept: one on the test object, what must be tested ?;
another on the burden of proof, who has the burden of proving it? Or better
yet, who is hurt by the lack of proof? Let's see them.
The object
of the evidence is "the damage, the defect and the causal relationship
between the defect and the damage." These are
the three requirements of the responsibility of the manufacturer
or producer, and their enumeration is relevant for two reasons. On the one
hand, it adds the need to prove an element that is not common in claims for
damages: the defect of the product. On the other hand, it eliminates the
need to prove negligence, departing from the general principle of subjective
liability established in article 1902 of the Civil Code (CC),
which is anchored in fault or negligence, which allows qualifying product
liability defective as objective .
In claims
for damage caused by vaccines, the opinion of the experts is very
important , since scientific knowledge is necessary to assess relevant
facts or circumstances. Once the expert evidence has been admitted and
practiced, the court will freely assess it "according to the rules of
sound judgment" (art. 348 of the Civil Procedure Law [LEC]).
Where
L is a valuation aware of the tests carried his
presence is indicated to the Court under Article 741 of the Law of Procedure Criminal (LEC) , which provides that the Court will sentence: "...
he is appreciating their conscience the evidence taken in the
trial,… ”.
Some facts do not need to be proven, either because they
are not controversial (art. 281.3 LEC), either because they enjoy absolute
and general notoriety (art. 281.4 LEC), or because they are favored by
a presumption, which may be legal (art. 385 LEC ) or judicial (art. 386 LEC).
The judge can, from a duly proven fact, deduce or presume the certainty
of another (presumed fact), due to the "precise and direct link" that
exists between the two "according to the rules of human criteria" (art.
386.1 LEC) . The presumption is not a means of proof, but is a judicial
activity carried out at the time of the evaluation of the evidence. The
plaintiff can provide facts ( temporal proximity, lack of family history )
that serve as clues to try to indirectly demonstrate the
existence of a causal relationship (alleged fact) . The defendant will
try to prove the non-existence of the alleged fact or the non-existence of the
link that supports the presumption (art. 385.2 LEC, to which art. 386.2 LEC
refers).
This does
not mean that if the plaintiff proves an extinct fact , the court will
not consider it because it does not have the burden of proving that fact. Here
the principle of undifferentiated contribution of the facts to the process
governs , so that the facts must be demonstrated regardless of who provides
the evidence. Once a fact has been proven, it no longer belongs to whoever
contributed it, and it may benefit or harm either party .
Two
conclusions can be drawn from the STJUE. The first is that, in cases of
scientific uncertainty, circumstantial evidence cannot be rejected ab initio
. Therefore, in the event of scientific uncertainty, the lawsuit
will not be dismissed simply because the plaintiff cannot provide direct proof
of scientific evidence. And the second is that for the evidence to have
evidentiary potential they must be "solid, concrete and
concordant" evidence. On several occasions, the STJUE object of
comment highlights the freedom of appreciation of the judge , who
will decide whether the evidence provided is sufficient
in law or not (paras. 38, 43 and 49).
INDICATIONS
OF CAUSALITY IN THE FACE OF SCIENTIFIC
UNCERTAINTY :
Indications
of causality: When the scientific investigation is not conclusive, some
concrete facts may be indications from which the judge can indirectly deduce
the existence of a defect and / or the causal relationship . The STJUE
of June 21, 2017, which is the subject of this comment, admits this
causal inference. Therefore, the plaintiff is not obliged to
demonstrate the causal relationship according to scientific criteria and
the claim cannot be dismissed due to this lack of direct proof of scientific
evidence .
The STJUE does not
resolve the issue of what facts can be valued as evidence that can be presumed
to exist of the defect and / or causal relationship.
Throughout
the Judgment, two facts are mentioned : the temporal
proximity between the supply of the vaccine and the appearance of the disease ,
and the lack of family history . At some point in time, mention
is made of a third piece of information : the existence
of a significant number of registered cases in which such a disease appeared as
a result of the administration of the aforementioned vaccine (para.
40). The CJEU considers that these facts "seem a priori to constitute
indications whose conjunction could, where appropriate, lead the national court
to consider that the injured party has complied with the burden of proof" (para.
40) if it considers that the administration of the vaccine is the most
plausible explanation for the occurrence of the disease (para. 41), but
this can only occur after taking into account all the circumstances of
the case and, in particular, the evidence provided by the producer (para. 42 ).
Scientific
evidence is not the only relevant evidence in a judicial process and the judge
must assess the evidence as a whole following reasonable criteria, but it
will be very difficult for the judge to rule in a sense other than scientific
consensus when it is clear and conclusive . If there are discrepancies
or opinions are provided by parties that are contradictory, the judge may
assess the scientific authority of the expert, the adoption of the scientific
method and coherence , and decide accordingly. The greater the
scientific consensus, the less chance the judge will have of making a free
assessment and deviating from the provisions of scientific studies .
Concluding that " systematically rejecting
evidence presented in the form of medical research as irrelevant, would
be as problematic in light of the Directive and the principle of effectiveness
as systematically rejecting other types of evidence in the absence of medical
research" (par. fifty).
In relation
to general causality and specific causality, some additional observation may be
added. The plaintiff seeking compensation does not have the burden of
proving generic causation and can focus on proving that their harm
was caused by that drug . However, generic causality is the
presupposition of specific causation, because if a drug is not suitable for
causing harm (in general), it cannot be possible that it has caused it
(specifically). Hence the importance of scientific evidence in
this matter. When there are doubts about the causal relationship ,
which is a different hypothetical case from the one at hand, the temporal
proximity between two events (the use or consumption of a certain drug, on the
one hand, and damage, on the other) can be a A clue that leads us to wonder if
there is such a causal relationship , but it does not allow us to
demonstrate, by itself, that causal relationship.
The judge
who hears the fund may consider , in exercise of his sovereign power
of appreciation, that the factual elements invoked by the plaintiff
constitute solid, concrete and concordant presumptions capable of
demonstrating the defect of the vaccine and the existence of a causal
relationship between said defect and the disease , despite
having found that medical research does not establish a relationship between
vaccination and the onset of the disease (para. 17).
It is not
the same to say that there is scientific agreement of the absence of a causal
relationship as to say that there is a lack of consensus .
Insofar as
the Directive does not only protect the consumer of the product, but also any
injured party (art. 4 Directive and 128 TRLGDCU), the expectation of
assessable safety is not limited to the consumer of the product, but is
extended to the general public .
The injured
party has the burden of proving the product defect , but that does
not mean that they have to identify the cause or origin of the product defect .
The flaw is the expectations of safety . The general public may
have the expectation of not contracting any disease after being
vaccinated against hepatitis B, but that expectation is unrealistic and
therefore not legitimate. What the general public can expect (and
it would be reasonable to do so) is, on the one hand , that the
vaccine will prevent severe liver infection caused by the hepatitis B
virus and, on the other , that the vaccine does not increase the
risk of suffering other diseases . If this risk exists, people
should be informed of it before being vaccinated .
The Directive
adopts a unitary concept of defect , without distinguishing
between design, manufacturing and information defects , categories that
do handle Spanish doctrine and jurisprudence . The design
defect affects the entire production series and is attributable to the
conception, structure or design of the product ; the manufacturing
defect occurs in isolated products of a series and is
attributable to the production chain ; the information defect derives
from insufficient or inadequate information on the risks of using the
product or on the instructions for its correct use .
The
hepatitis B vaccine does not have a design defect, but it could still generate
a legal claim for a manufacturing defect , although this is not
the specific case of Mr. W. This type of defect affects one or more
copies of the product whose Insecurity is higher than that of other
specimens of the product, which can occur if , for
example, a foreign body has been introduced in the manufacture or there
has been an error in the dose or composition of the vaccine . And if
a person contracts a serious liver infection caused by the
hepatitis B virus after being vaccinated to prevent it , they could
also claim compensation, although not for defective
product, but for inefficient product .
Legally ,
a causal relationship can be taken for granted when science doubts, but
not when science rules out . If the scientific evidence is
not conclusive, it is excessive to require the plaintiff to
provide scientific proof of general causation .
The CJEU does not turn its back on
the scientific community .
THREE .-
Importance of pharmacovigilance
in relation to adverse effects .
It is a responsibility shared by competent
authorities, marketing authorization holders and healthcare professionals .
Health professionals
have, among others, the obligation to report any suspected
adverse reaction of which they become aware during their usual practice
and send it as quickly as possible to the competent body in matters of pharmacovigilance
, using the form for collecting suspicions of adverse reactions. ("Yellow
card") - article 6 RD 577/2013.
The holder
of the authorization has an obligation -among others-, in relation to
suspected adverse reactions, to electronically register suspected adverse
reactions that occur in Spain, the European Union or in a third
country; communicate by electronic means the suspicions of individual cases of
adverse reactions in accordance with the requirements established in the
European Union; send by electronic means to the Eudravigilance database all
suspicions of serious adverse reactions that have occurred in the
European Union and in third countries, within fifteen calendar days
following the day on which they become aware of them, and suspected
adverse reactions not serious that occurred in the European Union
in the ninety calendar days following the day on which they
became aware of them; notify the AEMPS of suspected adverse reactions to
investigational drugs obtained through compassionate use; adequately identify
suspected adverse reactions whose notifier has explicitly reported that they
are the consequence of a medication error. Likewise, it must submit
periodic safety reports to the file created for this purpose by the
European Medicines Agency (art. 10 RD 577/2013), have a risk management system
for each medicine, carry out post-authorization efficacy studies (art.
11 ) and make a continuous assessment of the risk-benefit balance and updating
of the conditions of the authorization.
Pharmacovigilance
activity is carried out in Spain by the AEMPS, and in the case of a medicine
authorized by the European Commission, this activity is carried out by the European
Medicines Agency , and for this purpose, all European Union countries send
periodic information on suspicions of adverse reactions to the EudraVigilance
database, which can be accessed by all Member States.
Importance of the correct
pharmacovigilance process .
The correct
pharmacovigilance process allows to conclude , in the specific
case, that although the vaccine can cause adverse reactions in some
cases, it is not a generalized fact and in most cases it is mild
reactions that remit few days after the administration of the vaccine, and that
they do not have sufficient entity to question the benefit / risk ratio
that determined the authorization of the vaccine and its inclusion in
the vaccination schedule, in any case on a voluntary basis, although it is
tried to promote by the health authorities for the benefits it provides in
order to prevent cervical cancer.
However, attention
must be paid to the adverse reactions that the vaccine may produce and
which are included in the package leaflet and in the technical data sheet of
the medicine, which are updated as a result of the monitoring activity.
Although, they will only give rise to compensation in the case of malpractice.
Informed
consent .
Vaccination
does not constitute a singular medical or surgical treatment but rather a
massive action that has been previously tested for safety and is subject
to previous technical reports that support it , without prejudice to
the consequences of adverse reactions that may occur and that may be associated
with malpractice could be subject to compensation.
In this
regard, the Supreme Court considers that it is sufficient that in the act of
inoculation of the virus , the person receiving it is verbally warned of
those minor consequences that may arise and that
will disappear in a short time and indicate the means to alleviate its effects (SSTS
of September 12, 2012 -rec. 1467/2011; of October 4, 2012 -rec. 6878/2012).
The
information must be offered in understandable, clear and adapted terms to the
user of the assistance .
For all the
above,
TO THE COURT, PLEASE : Please note this writing, by
formulating the COMPLAINT ON PUBLIC HEALTH MATTERS and others, for the following alleged
continuing crimes:
Against public health and other correlatives and related .
Crime of injuries.
Crime against
humanity .
Cover-up crime .
Crime of discovery and disclosure of secrets ( discovery of secrets
or violation of the privacy of another, without their consent, use of technical
devices for listening, transmission, recording of messages, or any other
communication signal).
AND OTHERS, specified in
the same and agrees to open an Instruction through an urgent procedure
for the investigation of the alleged crimes reported.
OTHER I SAYS :
That, in accordance with the Legislation relating to free legal assistance, it is of interest to appear
in these proceedings by means of a Lawyer and Procurator, due to their
lack of resources, it is of interest for them to be officially appointed .
Recognition
of the right to free legal aid , can
be encouraged by the applicants before the court of his domicile .
By virtue of it,
TO THE INSTRUCTION COURT, IT REQUESTS AGAIN :
Please agree to the appointment of the
undersigned as Lawyer and Procurator of the Office shift for the
appearance and prosecution of these proceedings.
OTHER II SAYS : The following investigation procedures
are requested :
1º) Offer of actions to the
complainants
2º) Declaration of the
investigated
3º) Criminal records of those
investigated
4º) Judicial ratification of
the reports and studies accompanied with this document of DOCUMENTS
Nº 1 and 5 , respectively, by the witnesses / experts:
4º.1º)
Dr. D. Pablo Campra Madrid , Professor at the University of
Almería, and Doctor in Chemical Sciences and Bachelor of Biological Sciences ,
University of Almería (Spain), Carr. Sacramento, s / n, 04120 La Cañada, Almeria.
4º.2º) Dr. D. Luis Miguel
Benito de Benito, Digestologist , Av. De la
Peseta, C. Cuevas de Altamira, 40, Entry by, 28054 Madrid (Spain).
5º) Testimony / expert witness
of Mr. Ricardo Delgado Martín, Biostatistician , domiciled in Carmona (Seville,
Spain), with email ricardodelgado@laquintacolumna.net, so that:
Testify / issue a report about the existence of multiple
testimonies and audiovisuals collected in different parts of the world of this
anomaly of acquisition of magnetism caused after vaccination , investigated and collected on your Telegram channel "MAGNETIC PINCH" .
6º) Any other necessary proceedings in the opinion of
the Instructor.
OTHERS III SAYS : That, for the investigation of
the reported facts reported and the identity of the interested author, the
following investigation procedures be agreed, and
TO THE INSTRUCTION COURT, IT REQUESTS
AGAIN :
1) - An official letter is sent to the Scientific
Police in order to take samples from each vial of
each vaccination brand that is being inoculated in this Autonomous Community and
they are analyzed to determine their composition and determine
their degree or proportion , and report on its effect on public
health , determining whether its components exceed the
threshold allowed by current legislation in all its
detected components, especially in heavy metals, magnetic or
magnetizable components, germs, bacteria or nanoparticles , in a manner
that is attentive to those that are considered unusual or are being inoculated
on the population.
2) - The appointment of a Chemical Engineer expert is agreed to
issue an opinion on the same effects and ends.
For which
purposes it is proposed to Mr. …… ..
3) - The appointment of a Biological Engineer expert is agreed to
issue an opinion on the same effects and extremes.
For which
purposes it is proposed to Mr. …… ..
4) - An official letter is sent to the Ministry of
Health of this Autonomous Community so that its Biology and
Biochemistry Laboratory takes samples from each vial of each vaccination brand
that is being inoculated in this Autonomous Community and they are
analyzed to determine their composition and determine their
degree or proportion , and will report on its impact on public
health , dictating whether components of the permitted
threshold exceeded by the legislation in force in all its components
detected, especially in heavy metals, magnetic components or
magnetizable, germs, bacteria or nanoparticles, paying attention to
those that are considered unusual or that are being inoculated on
the population.
5) - An official letter is sent to the Scientific Police in order to
issue a report on the references it has over the last six
months on the existence or verification of such damage, injuries and
deaths presumably attributable to the inoculated vaccines.
6) - The appointment of a Chemical Engineer expert is agreed to
issue an opinion on the same effects and ends.
For which
purposes it is proposed to Mr. …… ..
7) - The appointment of a Biological Engineer expert is agreed to
issue an opinion on the same effects and ends.
For which
purposes it is proposed to Mr. …… ..
8) - An official letter is sent to the Scientific Police in order to
carry out an INVESTIGATION
during the next 30 days after receipt of said letter, and issue a report
on the existence or verification of such damages, injuries and
deaths presumably attributable to the inoculated vaccines, and the effects of
localization of the vaccinated by signals emitted by them by bluetoth, and the
effects of magnetization of the same in their body after vaccination.
9) An official letter is sent to the Department
/ Health Service of the Autonomous Community in order to issue a report on the
references it has over the last six months on the existence or
verification of such damages, injuries and deaths presumably attributable to
the inoculated vaccines , and the effects of localization of the vaccinated by
signals emitted by them by bluetoth, and the magnetizing effects of the same in
their body after vaccination.
10) An official letter is sent to the Ministry
of Health for the same purposes.
11) - The appointment of an external and independent Industrial
Engineer expert is agreed in order to carry out an investigation and
issue an opinion on the same effects and ends.
Ordering what is necessary so that it has access to the programs and instruments of laboratory, computer science,
communications and control of the companies, agencies and entities in charge of
the control, supervision, analysis and pharmacovigilance of vaccination, and of
the private and public entities that have the Instruments necessary to carry
out its inspection, analysis and opinion.
And that it verifies if there are registered data, analyzes,
processes, instruments, and controls of any kind referring to such damages, injuries and deaths presumably attributable to the inoculated
vaccines, and the effects of locating those vaccinated by signals emitted by
them by bluetoth. , and the magnetizing effects of the same in your body after
vaccination, and if such records,
analyzes, processes, instruments and controls are agreed , put into
practice, and the means to carry them out.
For which
purposes it is proposed to Mr. …… ..
12) - agreed appointment of expert Chemist so that perform
research and deliver an opinion on the same effects and ends.
Ordering what is necessary so that it has access to the programs and instruments of laboratory, computer science,
communications and control of the companies, agencies and entities in charge of
the control, supervision, analysis and pharmacovigilance of vaccination, and of
the private and public entities that have the Instruments necessary to carry
out its inspection, analysis and opinion.
And that it verifies if there are registered data, analyzes,
processes, instruments, and controls of any kind referring to such damages, injuries and deaths presumably attributable to the inoculated
vaccines, and the effects of locating those vaccinated by signals emitted by
them by bluetoth. , and the magnetizing effects of the same in your body after
vaccination, and if such records,
analyzes, processes, instruments and controls are agreed , put into
practice, and the means to carry them out.
For which
purposes it is proposed to Mr. …… ..
13) - The appointment of an expert Biologist Engineer is agreed in
order to carry out research and issue an opinion on the same effects and
extremes.
Ordering what is necessary so that it has access to the programs and instruments of laboratory, computer science,
communications and control of the companies, agencies and entities in charge of
the control, supervision, analysis and pharmacovigilance of vaccination, and of
the private and public entities that have the Instruments necessary to carry
out its inspection, analysis and opinion.
And that it verifies if there are registered data, analyzes,
processes, instruments, and controls of any kind referring to such damages, injuries and deaths presumably attributable to the inoculated
vaccines, and the effects of locating those vaccinated by signals emitted by
them by bluetoth. , and the magnetizing effects of the same in your body after
vaccination, and if such records,
analyzes, processes, instruments and controls are agreed , put into
practice, and the means to carry them out.
For which
purposes it is proposed to Mr. …… ..
13) A letter is sent to the Department / Health
Service of the Autonomous Community in order for it to carry out an INVESTIGATION during the
next 30 days after receipt of said letter, and issue a report on
the existence or verification of such damages, injuries and deaths
presumably attributable to the inoculated vaccines, and the effects of
localization of the vaccinated by signals emitted by them by bluetoth, and the
magnetizing effects of the same in their body after vaccination.
14) An official letter is sent to the Ministry
of Health for the same purposes.
17) That an injunction be sent to the Administrative
Litigation Court nº…. of… , in Spain, in appeal file nº…
/ 21 , so that free testimony of the answer of the
Ministry of Health or the appropriate authority that sent an answer to
the letter issued to the same interested party could send a report on
whether it had analyzed or had knowledge of having done it to the virus of
COVID-19 or SARS COV 2 or if it had proof of its existence or of its isolation
or detection .
And this testimony is referred to this Court.
OTHER IV SAYS : That, due to the seriousness
of the facts revealed to this Court with this brief,
TO THE INSTRUCTION COURT, IT REQUESTS
AGAIN :
It is agreed to send a letter
to the Department / Health Service of this Autonomous Community and to
the Ministry of Health in order to order the immediate suspension
of vaccination against COVID 19 or SARS COV 2 in their respective territories
of their powers.
OTHER V SAYS : That, for
having stated the witness / expert Dr. D. Pablo
Campra Madrid (Spain), in his
intervention in the video on the link https://odysee.com/@laquintacolumna:8/PRESENTACI%C3 % 93NINFORMET% C3%
89CNICOFINALDETECCI% C3% 93NGRAFENOENVACUNASCOVID-PROGRAMAESPECIAL-: 4 , having received severe threats due to the
development of their professional work in the investigation carried out by the
same with the result of the issuance of the report / opinion indicated above,
it is agree to his personal protection , in order
to avoid damage to his personal integrity and in order to ensure
collaboration with the Administration of Justice , and he is given
immediate protection by the Civil Guard Corps to ensure that his
personal integrity is safeguarded and take no risk.
It is accompanied with this document on CD, of DOCUMENT No. 9 .
Likewise, and, to achieve the same ends, the same personal
protection is granted to the witness / expert Dr. Luis Miguel
Benito de Benito and the witness
/ expert Mr. Ricardo Delgado Martín .
TO THE INSTRUCTION COURT, IT REQUESTS
AGAIN :
It is agreed accordingly.
It is of Justice that asks in ……… to ……… ..
November of two thousand twenty-one.
1
1
Comentarios
Publicar un comentario